Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement Fall Precautions for High-Risk Resident

Monmouth, Illinois Survey Completed on 07-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement fall precautions for a resident identified as high risk for falls. According to the facility's Fall Reduction policy, residents with a high fall risk should have individualized interventions documented and implemented in their care plan. The resident in question had multiple diagnoses, including unsteadiness on feet, dementia, and a history of repeated falls. The care plan specifically required the use of gripper socks as an intervention to reduce fall risk. Despite these documented interventions, observations on two separate occasions showed the resident seated in common areas without gripper socks or any foot coverings, with bare feet on the floor. Staff present at the time confirmed that the resident was supposed to wear gripper socks at all times due to the high risk of falls and previous incidents. The lack of adherence to the care plan's fall prevention measures constituted a failure to provide adequate supervision and implement necessary precautions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙