Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Advance Directive Preferences

Geneseo, Illinois Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that advance directives accurately reflected a resident's current preferences regarding life-sustaining treatment. According to the facility's policy, the POLST (Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form should be completed or reviewed with the resident and/or their legal representative and updated periodically to reflect the resident's wishes. For one resident, the POLST form and care plan documented a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status, but there was no evidence in the clinical record that any discussion had occurred with the resident regarding their code status preferences. During an interview, the resident, who was documented as cognitively intact on both admission and quarterly MDS assessments, stated that no one had asked about their wishes in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest and clearly expressed a desire for full resuscitation efforts. The Social Service Director reported that code status is typically discussed with residents or their representatives, but in this case, decisions were made by the state guardian without documented input from the resident, despite the resident's capacity to make such decisions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙