Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Interventions for High-Risk Residents

Palos Hills, Illinois Survey Completed on 08-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions as outlined in its Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines for two residents identified as high risk for falls. One resident with severely impaired cognition, who had a documented history of falls, was observed in bed without the required floor padding in place. Additionally, this resident was unable to use the standard call light, and when tested, the call light was found to be nonfunctional until it was forcefully reconnected. The care plan for this resident specified the use of floor mats and an alternative call system, but these interventions were not in place at the time of observation. Another resident, also identified as high risk for falls, was observed in bed with the floor padding positioned two feet away from the bed rather than at the bedside as required. The care plan for this resident included the use of floor mats and maintaining the bed in the lowest position, but the observed placement of the floor mat did not align with these interventions. Staff interviews confirmed that both residents were considered high risk for falls and that the specified interventions should have been implemented according to facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙