Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement Appropriate Fall Interventions for Cognitively Impaired Resident

Rushville, Illinois Survey Completed on 08-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement appropriate fall prevention interventions for a resident with a history of multiple falls and cognitive impairment. The resident, who had diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA), osteoarthritis, depression, diabetes, hemiplegia, and short-term memory deficits, experienced several falls over a period of months. Despite documented falls in both common areas and the resident's bathroom, the interventions implemented by the facility primarily consisted of education and signage, such as reminders to lock wheelchair brakes and to wear non-skid socks or shoes. These interventions were not tailored to the resident's cognitive limitations, as the resident had moderate cognitive loss and required substantial to maximal assistance with transfers. Staff interviews confirmed that the interventions were not appropriate for the resident's cognitive status. The restorative nurse and the director of nursing both acknowledged that education and signage were insufficient for a resident with cognitive impairment. The facility's own policies required ongoing assessment and the implementation of pertinent interventions to prevent subsequent falls, but the actions taken did not address the resident's specific needs, resulting in repeated falls and a failure to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙