Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0645
E

Failure to Complete Required PASARR Screenings for Residents with Mental Illness

Chicago, Illinois Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to initiate new Level I PASARR screenings for four residents with known mental illnesses, as required for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Documentation for these residents showed diagnoses such as schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and delusional disorders. However, their PASARR records were either incomplete, did not indicate a reasonable basis for suspecting mental illness or developmental delay, or incorrectly stated that no Level II PASARR was required despite the presence of qualifying diagnoses. There was no documentation to show that appropriate Level II PASARR screenings had been completed for these residents. Interviews with facility staff revealed confusion and inconsistent understanding of PASARR requirements, particularly regarding which residents required new screenings and the process for updating expired screenings. The Social Services Director and Admissions Director each described different responsibilities and procedures for ensuring PASARR compliance, with both referencing a belief that residents admitted prior to a certain date were "grandfathered" and did not require new screenings. Facility policy required compliance with federal and state PASARR standards and obtaining complete PASARR documentation from referral sources, but the observed practice did not align with these requirements.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙