Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0563
D

Failure to Honor Resident Visitation Rights

East Moline, Illinois Survey Completed on 08-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's right to receive visitors of his choosing, specifically by not allowing the resident's significant other to visit. The Social Services Director stated that the significant other was not permitted to visit and that this decision was made by the facility and the police, with the resident's guardians also involved in the decision-making process. The receptionist confirmed that all receptionists were instructed not to allow the significant other to visit, to ask her to leave if she arrived, and to involve the police if necessary. The electronic check-in system was programmed to deny her access. The significant other continued to call the facility frequently to request visitation. The administrator reported that he was unaware of the situation until questioned by surveyors and stated that, unless there was an order of protection, visitation should not be restricted. The resident's admission record identified the significant other as his partner, and the facility was unable to provide any legal documentation prohibiting her visits. The facility's visitation policy supports residents' rights to receive visitors, and the resident's care plan did not address any need for restricted or limited visitation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙