Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Range of Motion Impairments

Danville, Illinois Survey Completed on 05-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three residents, resulting in discrepancies between the documented range of motion (ROM) impairments and the residents' actual physical abilities. For one resident, the MDS indicated limited ROM in the lower extremities and no impairment in the upper extremities, while observation revealed a contracture in the left hand and inability to flex the fingers. Another resident's MDS inconsistently documented one-sided impaired ROM across multiple assessments, despite staff interviews confirming that the resident had upper and lower extremity impaired ROM and was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living since admission. A third resident's MDS documented one-sided impairment for ROM to upper and lower extremities, but both staff interviews and direct observation showed that the resident could move both arms and legs, assist with feeding, and hold a coffee cup unassisted. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged misunderstanding the definition of impaired ROM when coding previous MDS assessments. The facility's policy requires accurate and thorough assessments per MDS guidelines, but these requirements were not met for the residents involved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙