Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0583
D

Failure to Maintain Resident Confidentiality and Privacy

Danville, Illinois Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff at the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality and privacy of a resident's personal and medical information. Multiple staff members, including CNAs, an LPN, and activity aides, discussed the resident's alleged history of abuse and molestation of family members in various locations throughout the facility, such as hallways, the nurses' station, and offices with open doors. These conversations were overheard by other staff and could have been overheard by anyone nearby, including visitors. The information was not only shared among staff but also discussed in a manner that was not discreet or appropriate, violating the facility's policy on resident rights and confidentiality. The resident in question was documented as having severe cognitive impairment. Staff acknowledged that such discussions were inappropriate and against policy, with some expressing discomfort and concern about the relevance of the information to the resident's care. The administrator confirmed that discussing a resident's history in this manner was not appropriate. The facility's own policy emphasized the importance of privacy and confidentiality for all residents, which was not upheld in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙