Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Incomplete Investigation of Abuse Allegation Involving Psychoactive Substance

Emmett, Idaho Survey Completed on 08-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of abuse involving a resident with multiple diagnoses, including schizophrenia, auditory hallucinations, and chronic pain syndrome. The incident involved two dietary aides who provided the resident with THC gummies on two separate occasions after the resident had jokingly requested them. The facility's investigation included interviews with the involved resident and two unidentified dietary staff, both of whom confirmed the aides' actions. Additionally, three other residents were interviewed, but they were only asked general safety questions and not specifically about the incident or drug-related concerns. The investigation substantiated the allegation, as evidenced by the termination of the two dietary aides. However, the investigative process was incomplete because resident interviews did not address the specific incident or related drug concerns, limiting the scope and thoroughness of the inquiry. This incomplete approach created the potential for undetected harm due to the lack of comprehensive investigative procedures.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙