Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0726
D

Inaccurate Fall Risk Assessments by Nursing Staff

Honolulu, Hawaii Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that nurses and nurse aides demonstrated appropriate competency in completing fall risk evaluations for multiple residents. In one case, a resident with a history of falls and a recent major injury (fractured rib) was assessed as high risk for falls prior to and after the incident, but a subsequent evaluation by an RN recorded a significantly lower score, indicating low risk, without justification. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the evaluation was completed improperly and that staff are expected to question such discrepancies. Similar issues were identified for two other residents: one with a history of recurrent falls and a femur fracture, whose fall risk assessment after a third fall was incomplete and scored much lower than previous assessments, and another resident whose post-fall assessment was also incomplete and showed a lower risk score than prior evaluations. These deficiencies were identified through interviews and record reviews, which revealed that fall risk assessments were not completed accurately or thoroughly, particularly in the areas of gait/balance and medications. The improper completion of these assessments placed the affected residents at risk of avoidable adverse outcomes, as their true fall risk status was not accurately reflected in their care plans.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙