Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Ensure Resident Dignity and Timely Response to Care Needs

Honolulu, Hawaii Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure residents' rights to a dignified existence and timely care, as evidenced by multiple incidents involving delayed staff response to call lights and lack of respect for residents' privacy. One resident reported that staff response to call lights was inconsistent, with a specific incident where a call light was activated for a roommate whose legs were dangling off the bed, and staff took approximately 25 minutes to respond. The resident's representative also described two separate occasions where family members waited 30 minutes to an hour for staff to respond to call lights to address the resident's incontinence needs. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that these response times were excessive and not in line with facility expectations. Another resident, who was cognitively intact and had hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke, reported that staff did not knock or ask permission before entering his room and failed to close his bathroom door as requested, despite signage instructing staff to do so. The resident also stated that a CNA made him wait 30 minutes before assisting with toileting. The Director of Nursing confirmed that not all of the resident's complaints had been formally investigated and agreed that the resident should have been treated with respect and dignity, as outlined in the facility's policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙