Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
E

Failure to Document and Resolve Resident Grievances per Policy

Honolulu, Hawaii Survey Completed on 06-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain proper documentation of resident grievances as required by its own policy and federal regulations. Six sampled grievances were reviewed, and none met the documentation requirements for recording the grievance decision. The facility's policy designates the Administrator as the Grievance Official and outlines responsibilities for tracking, investigating, and issuing written decisions regarding grievances, as well as maintaining a grievance log for three years. However, the facility did not follow these procedures, and the required documentation was incomplete or missing for all reviewed grievances. Specific examples include incomplete Concern Forms for multiple grievances reported by two residents and a family member. For instance, one resident reported issues such as mold and water damage, insufficient CNA staffing during night shifts, and missing personal items. The forms lacked documentation of immediate actions taken, investigation, follow-up, or resolution, and did not indicate whether the resident was satisfied with the outcome. Another family member reported concerns about resident care, therapy communication, and food quality, but the forms again lacked documentation of satisfaction, follow-up, or final resolution. During interviews, the Administrator confirmed that the facility did not have a Social Services Director at the time and acknowledged that grievance documentation and the grievance log were not kept up to date. The Administrator stated that some follow-up actions were taken, such as referring maintenance issues and reviewing staffing schedules, but these actions were not documented as required. As a result, it was unclear what actions had been taken in response to grievances and whether residents or their representatives were satisfied with the outcomes.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙