Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
E

Failure to Ensure Residents Understand Binding Arbitration Agreements

Honolulu, Hawaii Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that three residents and their representatives fully understood the Binding Arbitration Agreement during the admission process. Interviews revealed that one family representative did not remember signing the agreement and was unaware of its contents, citing the overwhelming number of admission forms. Another resident stated she signed all admission papers but did not recall any discussion about the arbitration agreement and was unfamiliar with its details, indicating she would not have signed if she had known it waived her right to a traditional court trial. A third resident also did not remember signing the agreement or understanding its purpose, expressing indifference due to not having issues with the facility at the time. A staff interview with the Business Office Manager confirmed that the facility follows its policy regarding arbitration agreements during admissions. Review of the facility's policy indicated that residents and their representatives should be informed of the nature and implications of the agreement, including their right to refuse without affecting admission or continued care. The policy also requires that the agreement be explained in a manner and language the resident or representative understands, and that acknowledgment of understanding is obtained. Despite these policy requirements, the sampled residents and representative did not demonstrate understanding of the agreement, leading to the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙