Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Food and Drink Preferences

Honolulu, Hawaii Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with diagnoses including diabetes, end stage renal disease, hemodialysis, heart failure, and high cholesterol was not provided with food and drink that accommodated his stated preferences. Despite repeated requests over several weeks for specific items such as a turkey sandwich with cheese for lunch, tea instead of milk, and dry cereal for breakfast, these preferences were not honored by the facility. As a result, the resident refused to eat the food provided by the facility and relied on outside food brought in by family members, leading to feelings of malnourishment and weakness. Interviews with staff revealed ongoing miscommunication between nursing and kitchen staff regarding the resident's diet waiver, which allowed him to eat preferred foods. The Food Services Director acknowledged the miscommunication and confirmed that the resident's preferences had not been consistently accommodated. Facility policy requires that food and drink be provided in accordance with resident preferences, but this was not followed in the resident's case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙