Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0676
D

Failure to Provide Communication Supports for Non-English Speaking Residents

Honolulu, Hawaii Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate care and treatment to support the communication abilities of two residents whose primary languages were not English. Upon admission, both residents were identified as needing interpreter services and alternative communication methods, but the facility did not implement effective person-centered communication plans. For one resident who spoke only Vietnamese, the care plan inaccurately listed her primary language as both Cantonese and Vietnamese, and there was no evidence that interpreter services were used. The resident's family representative confirmed that interpreter services were never offered or used, and staff did not request her assistance to interpret. Observations revealed that communication aids, such as picture cards with Vietnamese words, were not accessible at the bedside, and there were no pain scale cards available to assess the resident's pain level. For the second resident, whose preferred language was Mandarin, the facility's staff were unaware of the available professional translator service and could not locate the communication board intended for the resident's use. The communication board was found on the roommate's side of the room, out of reach. Interviews with staff revealed that they primarily relied on gestures to communicate and were not aware of the translator service or the communication tools that should have been available. The facility's policy required the use of communication methods in a language familiar to the resident, but this was not followed in practice. These deficiencies were identified through observation, interviews, and record review, and demonstrated that the facility did not ensure residents with limited English proficiency had access to necessary communication supports. As a result, the residents were at increased risk of not having their needs met and were hindered from attaining their highest practicable well-being.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙