Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plan and Provide Intervention for Dialysis Access Site

Honolulu, Hawaii Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise the care plan for one resident receiving dialysis and did not provide an intervention for the resident's dialysis access site after returning from dialysis with a pressure dressing in place. The resident, who has a history of end stage renal disease, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, diabetes, dementia, and dependence on renal dialysis, was observed with a dressing on his upper left arm after returning from dialysis. The resident reported that the dressing was applied at the dialysis center and that sometimes nurses at the facility remove it and apply Band-Aids if there is still bleeding. Review of the resident's care plan showed it included monitoring for complications from hemodialysis, avoiding blood draws or blood pressure measurements on the arm with the arteriovenous fistula, encouraging attendance at dialysis appointments, and monitoring for signs of infection or renal insufficiency. However, the care plan did not include specific interventions for the care of the dialysis access site or removal of the pressure dressing after dialysis. Interviews with nursing staff revealed inconsistent practices regarding who is responsible for removing the pressure dressing and when it should be removed. One nurse stated that the night shift is responsible, while another indicated that the dressing is usually removed within two hours of the resident's return from dialysis, but confirmed it was not removed as expected. The Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no established protocol for the removal of the pressure dressing prior to contacting the dialysis center for guidance. The lack of a clear intervention in the care plan and inconsistent staff practices resulted in the resident retaining the pressure dressing for an extended period after returning from dialysis, without appropriate assessment or intervention documented in the care plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙