Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
G

Failure to Document and Manage Severe Nut Allergy Resulting in Resident Harm

Honolulu, Hawaii Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

Fine: $8,278
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to document the severity of a resident's nut allergy, failed to develop and implement a care plan addressing the allergy, and did not ensure that all recipes used in the kitchen were reviewed for food allergens before serving food to residents. The resident, who had a documented history of severe nut allergy, was admitted with multiple diagnoses including asthma and dysphasia, and was cognitively intact. Despite the resident and her family providing information about her nut allergy and its severity, this information was not fully documented in the electronic health record or communicated to the interdisciplinary team. The facility's admission and care planning processes did not include specific details about the resident's allergic reactions, nor were food restrictions related to her allergies included in her orders or care plan. The dietician noted the allergy in personal notes but did not share this information in the resident's chart or with the interdisciplinary team. The kitchen staff were unaware of the resident's nut allergy and continued to use a recipe containing nuts, as the recipe was not included in the template reviewed for allergens. As a result, the resident was served a dessert containing nuts, which led to an anaphylactic reaction. Following the consumption of the dessert, the resident experienced symptoms including periorbital swelling, itching, and oxygen desaturation, requiring administration of Benadryl and oxygen, and subsequent transfer to the emergency room for treatment of anaphylactic shock. Interviews with facility staff revealed that allergies were not routinely included in baseline care plans, and staff relied on discharge summaries rather than direct interviews with residents to determine allergy severity and reactions. The lack of communication and documentation directly contributed to the resident being exposed to a known allergen, resulting in harm.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙