Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
E

Failure to Address and Resolve Resident Grievances

Albany, Georgia Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

8 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to address and resolve grievances raised by residents during council meetings for four out of seven months reviewed. Record review showed that issues such as lack of tea, late meals, inability to eat in the dining room on weekends, timing of evening meals, absence of coffee, and broken kitchen equipment were documented in the Patient/Resident Council Minutes/Report Forms. However, there was no evidence that these grievances were tracked, resolved, or that written decisions were issued to the individuals who filed them, as required by the facility's grievance policy. Interviews with staff revealed that while the Activity Director documented complaints and forwarded them to the relevant department heads, there was no follow-up with residents regarding the outcomes of their grievances. The Social Worker (BSW) confirmed that grievances were discussed in morning meetings but was not involved in resolving them, and the Social Worker (MSW) had not previously reviewed grievances from the council minutes. The Administrator acknowledged that staff should be educated on the grievance process and that any staff member could write a grievance, but the process for tracking and resolving grievances was not consistently followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙