Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Incomplete Documentation of Skin Assessments and Treatments

Richmond Hill, Georgia Survey Completed on 08-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for a resident with a history of acute kidney failure and moderate cognitive impairment, specifically in the area of skin condition management. The resident's care plan included interventions for monitoring skin integrity and treating a diagnosis of candidiasis, with instructions for regular skin assessments and topical medication administration. However, documentation in the electronic medical record showed that several scheduled weekly skin assessments were not recorded as completed on specific dates. Interviews with LPNs revealed that while some assessments were performed, the staff failed to document them due to being busy or forgetting. Additionally, the resident's treatment administration records for a prescribed steroid cream indicated multiple instances where there was no documentation of the treatment being administered as ordered. Several LPNs confirmed in interviews that they had provided the treatments but neglected to sign off on the treatment administration records after completion. Both the Regional Nurse Consultant and the Administrator acknowledged that all assessments and treatments should have been documented in a timely manner, but this was not consistently done.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙