Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Provide Required Bed-Hold Rate Notification During Hospitalization

Eatonton, Georgia Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a resident or their representative with written notice specifying the duration and daily rate of the bed-hold policy during two separate hospitalizations. According to the facility's own policy, a bed-hold letter should be sent to the resident or their designee, clearly stating the amount to be paid per day for a private bed hold. However, review of the documentation for the resident's transfers to the hospital revealed that the notices sent did not include the specific daily bed-hold rate, only general information about the policy and a statement that the rate would be communicated later. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of clarity and consistency regarding the process for notifying residents or their representatives about the bed-hold rate. The LPN stated that no paperwork was sent by the charge nurse to the family, and the DON was unsure if the notification included the required rate or where documentation of the mailing was kept. The social worker reported that she no longer documented when the bed-hold notification was sent and was unaware that the specific charge needed to be included in the notice. The resident involved had a primary diagnosis of hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy and was transferred to the hospital on two occasions for altered mental status.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙