Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
F

Failure to Prepare and Follow Advance Menus with Diet-Specific Modifications

Fairburn, Georgia Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that menus were prepared in advance and included necessary details such as serving sizes and diet-specific modifications for residents' diet orders. During the survey, the facility was unable to provide complete menu cycles and menu extensions for all diets, and the available documentation did not specify which foods were appropriate for various modified diets, including soft, bite-sized, potassium-restricted, finger food, reduced sodium, no added salt (NAS), and renal diets. Observations revealed that meals served did not always match the planned emergency menus, and handwritten instructions for meal preparation lacked information on portion sizes and diet accommodations. Staff interviews confirmed that, following a kitchen fire, the facility relied on emergency menus but did not consistently provide documentation or guidance for dietary modifications or portion sizes. Residents reported receiving meals that differed from the emergency menu, and dietary staff were observed preparing meals without clear instructions on the amount of food to serve or how to modify meals for specific diets. The Registered Dietician stated that the food service vendor provided menus and recipes for all diets, but these were not fully utilized by the dietary manager during the emergency period. The facility was unable to provide a dietary policy regarding menu preparation and documentation before the survey exit, and the lack of clear, advance menu planning and documentation placed all residents receiving oral meals at risk of nutritional problems and dissatisfaction.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙