Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0757
D

Failure to Hold Antihypertensive Medication per Physician Order

Pooler, Georgia Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with a diagnosis of hypertension received a blood pressure medication, Amlodipine Besylate 5 mg, despite physician orders specifying the medication should be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 130. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that the medication was administered on multiple occasions when the resident's documented SBP was below the ordered threshold, including readings of 111/92 and 123/75. The facility's policy required verification of physician orders and performance of necessary evaluations, such as blood pressure checks, prior to medication administration. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the medication should not have been given based on the recorded blood pressure readings. The LPN could not explain why the medication was administered despite the low SBP, and the DON acknowledged that the medication should have been held according to the physician's order and facility policy. This failure resulted in the resident receiving unnecessary medication.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙