Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0567
D

Delayed Access to Resident Funds for Responsible Party

Atlanta, Georgia Survey Completed on 06-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's responsible party (RP) had immediate access to the resident's funds, as required by facility policy. According to the Resident Funds Management Policy and Procedure, if a resident requests a check from their account, the facility is to process the request within 24 hours. However, record review showed that the resident's Social Security Administration (SSA) direct deposits were made monthly, but the corresponding cash advances to the RP were often delayed by one to two months. The RP confirmed receiving the funds late, with the May funds only received in June, despite checks being scheduled for mailing on the 10th of each month. Interviews with the Business Office Manager (BOM) revealed that the process required resident confirmation before releasing funds to the RP, and delays were attributed to staff being busy. The BOM acknowledged that the resident had no cognitive issues preventing her from authorizing the release of funds and that this resident was the only one with a consistent arrangement for monthly cash advances to her RP. The resident confirmed that her RP had access to her funds, but the facility did not consistently provide timely access as outlined in their policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙