Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Prevent and Timely Identify Pressure Ulcer at PEG Tube Site

Camilla, Georgia Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility A failed to prevent the development of a facility-acquired pressure ulcer in one resident who was at risk, as identified through interviews, record reviews, and policy review. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses including palliative care, stroke, and gastrostomy status, was admitted with no open skin areas documented in weekly skin assessments. However, wound care documentation later identified a Stage II pressure injury at the PEG tube site, which was not detected until it had progressed to that stage. The facility's policy required skin inspections every shift, especially under medical devices, but the pressure ulcer was not identified during routine care or weekly assessments. Interviews with staff revealed that the pressure ulcer was discovered only after a note was left for the wound care nurse to examine the area under the PEG tube's plastic bumper. It was found that no gauze or foam was placed under the bumper, which is considered standard care, although not explicitly required by facility policy. The DON acknowledged that proper gastrostomy care, including the use of gauze or sponge, is covered during orientation and is standard practice. The administrator recognized the need for proper skin checks and adherence to policy and standards, but the deficiency occurred due to the failure to identify and prevent the pressure ulcer in a timely manner.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙