Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0691
D

Failure to Provide Nephrostomy Tube Care per Standards

Lutz, Florida Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate nephrostomy care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for a resident with multiple urological diagnoses, including obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease, and hydronephrosis. Upon observation, the resident's nephrostomy insertion site dressing was found to be not intact and had not been changed since before admission, as confirmed by the resident, who stated the last dressing change occurred at the hospital. The resident reported asking a nurse to change the dressing but was told there were no orders to do so. The urine in the nephrostomy bag appeared serosanguinous. Review of the medical record revealed no physician orders related to nephrostomy tube care, and the care plan did not include specific interventions for dressing changes or tube flushing. During interviews, the DON was unable to describe the care provided for the nephrostomy tube and acknowledged that orders for care had not been obtained. The facility's care plans addressed infection prevention and catheter care in general terms but did not specify nephrostomy tube management. Professional standards recommend changing the nephrostomy dressing at least every seven days or sooner if soiled or wet, which was not followed in this case. The lack of physician orders and failure to provide timely dressing changes led to the deficiency in care for the resident's nephrostomy tube.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙