Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
E

Failure to Ensure Informed Consent for Arbitration Agreements

Lutz, Florida Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents and their representatives were properly informed about the contents of binding arbitration agreements and their right to refuse such agreements. For three sampled residents, documentation and interviews revealed that either the resident or their representative signed the arbitration agreement without adequate understanding or explanation of its terms. In one case, a resident with advanced dementia and a designated healthcare surrogate signed the agreement personally, despite medical documentation indicating the resident was unable to provide meaningful information and required a surrogate for decision-making. The surrogate confirmed not being present or involved in the signing process. In another instance, an alert and oriented resident and their spouse did not recall any discussion or explanation regarding arbitration, despite the agreement being signed. Similarly, a third resident and their representative, who was the power of attorney, did not recall signing or having the arbitration agreement explained to them. Interviews with facility staff, including the Senior Nurse Navigator and the Nursing Home Administrator, confirmed that the process should involve reviewing and explaining the arbitration agreement to the resident or their representative, ensuring understanding, and informing them of their right to refuse. However, the facility did not have a specific policy regarding arbitration agreements, and the documented process was not consistently followed, as evidenced by the lack of informed consent and understanding among the sampled residents and their representatives.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙