Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0800
D

Failure to Provide Diabetic-Appropriate Diet and Adhere to Dietary Orders

North Miami, Florida Survey Completed on 06-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a diabetic resident did not receive a well-balanced diet that met their prescribed dietary needs. During breakfast, the resident was served a tray containing regular sugar and regular jelly, despite being on a Low Concentrated Sweets (LCS) and No Added Salt (NAS) diet. The tray also lacked a meat option, a choice of Vitamin C juice, sugar substitutes, and sugar-free jelly, all of which were specified in the resident's diet order. The resident, who has diabetes, hypertension, hemiplegia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and hyperlipidemia, reported not using the regular sugar or jelly and stated that diabetic-appropriate alternatives were not provided on his tray. At lunch, the same resident received a tray with black beans, rice, chopped baked chicken, unfrosted banana cake, and orange drink, but the tray was missing navy bean soup, buttered carrots or any vegetable, coffee or tea, and sugar substitutes, as outlined in the diet card. The resident's food preferences also indicated a dislike for rice and desserts or sweets, yet these items were present on the tray. Interviews with dietary staff confirmed that the resident should have received diabetic-appropriate items, such as sugar substitutes and diabetic jelly, and that substitutions for menu items were not properly communicated or executed, resulting in missing or incorrect food items. Record reviews showed that the resident's care plan and physician's orders required a therapeutic diet tailored to his medical conditions, including diabetes and risk for nutritional deficits. The facility's own policies mandated that residents receive nutritional care consistent with their assessments and dietary orders. However, observations and staff interviews revealed that the resident's dietary needs and preferences were not consistently met, leading to the identified deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙