Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0677
D

Failure to Provide Timely Meal Assistance to Dependent Residents

Bradenton, Florida Survey Completed on 08-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide timely and appropriate meal assistance to two residents who required help with eating during observed meal services. One resident with dementia and significant cognitive impairment was left seated at a dining table without a meal tray for 24 minutes while others at the table were eating, and then waited an additional 18 minutes with her meal tray in front of her without receiving any staff assistance to eat. This resident was unable to self-feed and required substantial or maximal assistance, as documented in her care plan and medical record. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident should not have waited so long for assistance and that there was sufficient staff present to provide the necessary help, but the resident was overlooked during the meal service. Another resident with diagnoses including dementia, aphasia, dysphagia, and a history of malnutrition was observed to receive a meal tray but did not attempt to eat and was not approached by staff for assistance for at least ten minutes. When staff did assist, the help was intermittent and inconsistent, with staff leaving the resident to assist others and not returning promptly. The resident required set-up, encouragement, and sometimes physical assistance to initiate and continue eating, as documented in the care plan and therapy notes. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about the resident's care plan requirements, and some staff were unaware of the specific level of assistance needed, leading to delays and inadequate support during meals. Both residents had documented needs for meal assistance in their care plans and medical records, including requirements for physical help, verbal cues, and encouragement to eat. Despite this, staff failed to provide timely and consistent assistance, resulting in prolonged periods where the residents were unable to eat or required prompting to begin eating. Facility policy required that meals not be served until an attendant was ready to assist, but this was not followed, contributing to the deficiencies observed during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙