Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Obtain and Maintain Advance Directive and POA Documentation

Bradenton, Florida Survey Completed on 08-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that an advance directive and Power of Attorney (POA) documentation were properly formulated and maintained in the medical record for a resident with severely impaired decision-making skills. Upon admission, the resident was identified as having both short-term and long-term memory problems and was assessed as severely impaired in decision-making. The admission record indicated the resident was a full code status, but there was no documentation of a designated POA or primary decision-maker for care in the medical record. The social assessment form, completed by the resident's spouse, noted that a POA document existed and would be provided to the facility, but there was no evidence that the facility followed up to obtain this documentation until prompted during the survey. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the POA documentation was not present in the resident's record and that no further contact had been made with the spouse to secure the necessary documents prior to the survey. The spouse confirmed that the existence of the POA and advance directive had been discussed at admission, but the facility did not obtain or file the documentation as required by their policy. The facility's policy states that on admission, staff must determine if an advance directive exists and, if so, ensure copies are placed in the chart and communicated to staff, which was not done in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙