Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Address Resident's Communication Needs in Care Plan

Orlando, Florida Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop, implement, and revise a person-centered, comprehensive care plan to address the communication needs of a resident who was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had significant language and speech barriers. The resident, who had a history of stroke with residual speech and language deficits, impaired mobility, and other chronic conditions, was only able to understand Spanish and could not speak. Despite this, the care plan and CNA Kardex did not reflect the resident's preferred language or provide individualized communication strategies to address the language barrier. Staff interviews revealed that care was often provided in English, and there were no formal assignments of Spanish-speaking staff to assist the resident. A sign in the resident's room indicated her language needs, but this information was not incorporated into her official care plan. Family members expressed concerns to facility leadership about the resident's inability to understand staff, which led to the resident becoming frightened and withdrawn. The facility's own assessment acknowledged the presence of Hispanic residents and the need for culturally and linguistically appropriate care, but this was not translated into practice for this resident. Both the unit manager and MDS coordinator confirmed that the resident's language preference should have been included in the care plan, but it was not, and there was no evidence that this issue was discussed or addressed in care plan meetings.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙