Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Complete Monthly Medication Regimen Reviews and Document Physician Rationale

Zephyrhills, Florida Survey Completed on 08-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a licensed pharmacist performed monthly medication regimen reviews (MRRs) for residents, as required by policy and regulation. Specifically, for one resident, there was no documentation of a pharmacist-conducted MRR for three separate months, despite the resident being continuously admitted during that period. Additionally, a pharmacy review identified a significant drug interaction and made a recommendation regarding the resident's medication regimen, but while the physician disagreed with the recommendation, no clinical rationale was documented for this disagreement. For another resident, the consultant pharmacist recommended a gradual dose reduction of an antidepressant medication, but the physician disagreed without providing a clinical rationale either on the form or in a progress note. The facility's policy requires that physicians and staff identify and address potentially significant medication-related problems, and that consultant pharmacists use monthly reviews to identify problematic medications. Interviews with the DON confirmed the lack of required documentation and rationale in both cases.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙