Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Medical Record Documentation and Communication Failure

Pompano Beach, Florida Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain accurate and professionally documented medical records for one resident. The resident, who had a history of traumatic cerebral hemorrhage and severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 4), was admitted and later readmitted to the facility. The clinical record showed discrepancies in documentation, including a physician order for foley catheter removal and a treatment administration record indicating the catheter was removed. However, subsequent urology nurse practitioner (NP) consult notes repeatedly documented male genitalia assessments for a female resident and indicated the presence of a foley catheter after it had been removed. The NP confirmed during interviews that these entries were incorrect and that the resident was female, acknowledging that the male-specific information should not have been included. Additionally, the NP stated that he had not communicated with the resident's family or representative regarding significant findings, such as a right kidney mass identified on ultrasound, despite the resident's severe cognitive impairment. The NP admitted that he typically only contacts family if the resident is alert and did not reach out to the family or representative in this case. These actions and omissions resulted in medical records that were not accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙