Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0677
D

Failure to Provide Adequate ADL Assistance for Grooming and Hygiene

Lake Placid, Florida Survey Completed on 07-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for three residents, specifically in the areas of grooming, nail care, haircuts, and showers. One resident was observed with unkempt and matted hair, overgrown yellow fingernails with black debris, and expressed a desire for assistance with hair brushing and nail trimming. This resident was assessed as cognitively intact and dependent on staff for bathing and personal hygiene, with a care plan indicating the need for staff assistance in these areas. Despite these needs, the resident's grooming and hygiene were not adequately maintained. Another resident reported dissatisfaction with the length of their hair and the lack of available haircuts, noting that a beautician had not been present for several weeks. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility previously had a beautician who provided regular haircuts, but due to the beautician's absence, hair care services had lapsed. The process for residents to request haircuts was described, but it was also acknowledged that no beautician was currently available, and efforts to secure a replacement were ongoing. A third resident was observed with significant facial hair and stated a preference for being shaved, which was not consistently provided. Documentation and interviews revealed inconsistencies in the provision and recording of shaving assistance, with some shower logs lacking information on whether shaving was completed or if refusals occurred. The resident's care plan and progress notes did not address shaving needs or refusals, despite the resident's moderate cognitive impairment and dependence on staff for personal hygiene. The facility's ADL policy requires that residents unable to perform ADLs receive necessary services to maintain grooming and hygiene, but these requirements were not met for the residents reviewed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙