Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessment for Nutritional Approaches

Winter Park, Florida Survey Completed on 07-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident regarding nutritional approaches. The resident, who had a history of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, muscle wasting, chronic kidney disease, and other conditions, was admitted for care and later readmitted with generalized weakness and edema. The admission MDS assessment inaccurately documented that the resident received parenteral or intravenous (IV) feeding and a mechanically altered diet, including specific entries for percent intake by artificial route and average fluid intake by IV or tube feeding. However, review of the resident's medical record and diet orders confirmed that at no time was the resident on parenteral, IV feeding, or a mechanically altered diet; the resident was consistently on a regular diet with regular texture and thin liquids, with a fluid restriction and fortified food as ordered. Interviews with facility staff, including the Dietitian, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), and MDS Coordinator, confirmed the inaccuracies in the MDS assessment. The CDM acknowledged miscoding the resident as requiring a mechanically altered diet, and the MDS Coordinator was unable to explain the basis for the entries regarding parenteral or IV feeding. The facility's policy and job descriptions require accurate and comprehensive MDS assessments, but these were not followed in this instance, resulting in inaccurate documentation of the resident's nutritional status and care approaches.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙