Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0576
D

Failure to Ensure Resident Mail Privacy

Miami Beach, Florida Survey Completed on 06-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the privacy of a resident's mail, as mail addressed to the resident was opened without his consent. According to the facility's Mail/Package Screening Policy, mail should only be opened with written consent from the resident, and mail from federal or state agencies should not be opened. The resident, who had no cognitive impairment and was able to make his own decisions, reported receiving a letter from a state agency that had already been opened when it was delivered to him. He stated that he had previously informed staff to respect his privacy and not open his mail. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistencies in mail handling practices. The Director of Social Services acknowledged the resident's request not to have his packages opened and stated that staff encourage residents to open their own mail for safety reasons. The Recreation Therapy Director and the Administrator both indicated that mail is typically delivered unopened, but the Administrator admitted that the receptionist had opened a letter from a state agency addressed to the resident and brought it to his attention. The receptionist, however, denied opening any resident mail. This incident demonstrates a failure to follow established policies and procedures regarding resident mail privacy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙