Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0644
D

Failure to Incorporate PASRR Level II Recommendations for Visually Impaired Resident

Hockessin, Delaware Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

Fine: $17,345
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from a PASRR level II determination into the care plan of a resident with visual impairment. The PASRR level II, completed after a level I referral, specified that the resident required services and accommodations for visual impairment, including support with activities of daily living, nursing care, activities, care plan conferences, and assistance with reviewing or signing medical or financial documents. However, the resident's care plan, last revised prior to the PASRR determination, only referenced general vision care approaches and did not reflect the specific PASRR recommendations. Record review showed that the resident had a history of impaired vision related to diabetes and dense cataracts, had declined cataract surgery, and had periodic eye consultations. During interviews, facility staff were unable to provide documentation that the PASRR level II recommendations had been incorporated into the care plan. The PASRR determination was not readily accessible in the electronic medical record, and staff only obtained it upon the surveyor's request. The deficiency was confirmed through record review and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙