Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Act on Pharmacy Consultant Recommendations for Medication Management

East Windsor, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that physicians or advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) acted upon pharmacy consultant recommendations in a timely manner for three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. For one resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including diabetes, stroke, epilepsy, and gastrostomy, the pharmacy consultant made several recommendations over multiple months regarding medication management, such as adding stop dates for anticoagulants, switching medication forms for easier administration via feeding tube, and monitoring for side effects. Despite these recommendations, there was no documentation that the physician or APRN responded to or acted upon them within the expected timeframe, as required by facility policy. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the process for following up on pharmacy recommendations was inconsistent, with forms not always being reviewed, signed, or returned by the responsible providers. Another resident with a history of stroke, diabetes, and heart failure was started on an antipsychotic medication, and the pharmacy consultant recommended baseline and ongoing monitoring for side effects, as well as laboratory testing for lipid profiles. The clinical record review revealed that these recommendations were not completed, and the forms were not signed or dated by the provider. Interviews with nursing and pharmacy staff confirmed that the recommendations were not reviewed or acted upon, and the required monitoring and laboratory tests were not documented in the resident's record. A third resident with bipolar disorder and hyperlipidemia was receiving an antipsychotic medication, and the pharmacy consultant recommended ordering a lipid profile and HbA1C due to the risk of diabetes and dyslipidemia. Although the prescriber agreed with the recommendations, only the HbA1C was completed, and there was no documentation that the lipid profile was ordered or completed. Facility staff interviews indicated that the process for ensuring completion of pharmacy recommendations was not consistently followed, resulting in missed or delayed actions on important medication management recommendations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙