Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Monitor and Address Significant Weight Loss

East Windsor, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to adequately monitor and address the nutritional status and weight of a resident with a history of epilepsy, gastrostomy, and dysphagia, who was dependent on staff for care and had a G-tube for enteral nutrition. Upon admission, the resident weighed 173.6 lbs, but within a week, a significant weight loss of 9.4 lbs (5.4%) was documented. The dietitian recommended nutritional supplements and an appetite stimulant, but there was no evidence that the stimulant was started, and no follow-up weights or nutritional assessments were performed in the subsequent weeks. After a hospitalization and readmission, the resident's weight continued to decline, with a further loss of 21 lbs (12.1%) since admission. Despite this, there were no documented weights or nutritional assessments for the entire month following readmission, and the care plan was not revised to address the ongoing weight loss. Interviews revealed that the facility lacked consistent, in-person dietitian coverage, with periods of only remote coverage and uncertainty among staff about who was responsible for nutritional oversight. Staff also reported that diet slips and diet change forms were not being signed off by a dietitian for newly admitted residents. Facility policy required weights to be obtained on admission and monthly, with additional monitoring and interventions for significant weight changes. However, the resident did not receive the required monitoring or timely interventions after multiple episodes of significant weight loss. Interviews with staff and the resident confirmed that weight monitoring was inconsistent, and the lack of dietitian presence contributed to the failure to reassess and update the nutritional care plan as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙