Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Address Pharmacy Recommendations in a Timely Manner

Durham, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations regarding residents' medication regimens were addressed in a timely manner, as required by policy and regulatory guidelines. For one resident with dementia and mood disturbances, there was no documentation of a monthly medication review by a pharmacist for a specific month, and pharmacy recommendations regarding the use of Seroquel and monitoring for orthostatic blood pressure changes were not communicated to the psychiatric APRN for over six weeks. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the pharmacy recommendation was not placed in the APRN communication book, resulting in a significant delay in provider review and response. Additionally, the recommended orthostatic blood pressure monitoring was not implemented as directed by the pharmacy. For another resident with anxiety disorder and dementia, pharmacy recommendations regarding the continued use and justification of PRN Ativan were not addressed. The Director of Nursing did not discuss the recommendations with hospice, who was involved in the resident's care, and there was no recordkeeping of pharmacy recommendations after they were received by the facility. The psychiatric APRN was not made aware of the need to re-evaluate the PRN Ativan until prompted by surveyor inquiry, and the facility's process for ensuring timely review and response to pharmacy recommendations was not followed. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing, medical director, and APRNs, revealed inconsistent expectations and practices regarding the handling and documentation of pharmacy recommendations. The facility was unable to provide a policy for pharmacy recommendations and monthly reviews when requested. These failures resulted in pharmacy recommendations not being addressed within the expected timeframes and a lack of documentation and follow-through on medication regimen reviews for the residents involved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙