Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plan for Bowel and Bladder Retraining

Willimantic, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the care plan for a resident with bowel and bladder incontinence was updated to include the offering of a bowel and bladder retraining program, as well as documentation of any refusals to participate in such a program. The resident in question had diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and diabetes, and was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated frequent incontinence of both bowel and bladder, while the care plan noted incontinence related to impaired mobility and cognition, with interventions such as two-hour checks and observation of incontinence patterns. The care plan also documented resistance to care, including refusals of weights, medication, and care. Despite these findings, there was no evidence in the clinical record or care plan that the resident was offered a voiding trial or a bowel and bladder retraining program, nor was there documentation of the resident refusing participation in such programs. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that while the care plan addressed resistance to care, it did not specifically mention offering or refusal of retraining programs. This lack of documentation and action led to the deficiency cited in the report.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙