Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0809
E

Failure to Consistently Offer Snacks to Residents

Ridgefield, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that snacks were consistently offered to residents after dinner and before bed, as required by policy and resident needs. Resident interviews revealed that snacks were not always offered, and some residents had to request snacks rather than being proactively offered them. One resident with cerebral palsy, chronic kidney disease, and bipolar disorder, who required assistance with activities of daily living and set-up for meals, reported not always being offered snacks despite sometimes wanting one. Observations confirmed that while signage indicated snack times and available options, the process for distributing snacks relied on residents requesting them or being on a specific list. Staff interviews further indicated inconsistency and lack of clarity regarding the snack distribution process. Dietary staff delivered snacks based on a list provided by the dietician or nursing, but residents not on the list, including those who were bedbound, needed to ask for snacks. Nurse aides reported varying practices, with some not offering snacks to each room and others unsure of the policy. The administrator confirmed that staff were responsible for offering snacks but also stated that residents needed to request them. The facility's policy required snacks to be offered at bedtime and upon request, but the actual practice did not ensure all residents were proactively offered snacks as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙