Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0730
B

Failure to Complete Annual Performance Evaluations for Nurse Aides

Waterbury, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to complete required annual performance evaluations for two nurse aides, as evidenced by the absence of any such evaluations in their personnel files. Both nurse aides had been employed at the facility for multiple years and had worked several shifts during the review period. Despite requests, the facility was unable to provide documentation of completed annual evaluations for either employee. The Director of Nurses confirmed that performance evaluations should have been present in the personnel files and acknowledged that they had not been completed, attributing the oversight to a lapse in tracking and scheduling by human resources. No written facility policy on performance evaluations was provided when requested. This deficiency was identified through interviews and review of employee files, as well as time punch records confirming the ongoing employment and work activity of the nurse aides in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙