Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Follow Wound Consultant Recommendations for Pressure Ulcer Care

Waterbury, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to follow up on wound consultant recommendations for a resident with an unstageable pressure ulcer on the coccyx. The resident, who was bedfast most of the time and required maximum assistance for personal hygiene and bed mobility, had a care plan that included interventions such as a low air loss mattress, skin care protocols, and therapy consultations. However, the care plan did not address the resident's refusals to get out of bed or reposition, and there was no evidence that therapy or dietary consultations recommended by the wound consultant were initiated. The wound consultant had recommended ongoing treatments, optimization of nutrition, and a PT evaluation for support surfaces, but these recommendations were not communicated or acted upon by the therapy, dietary, or nursing staff. Observations showed the resident remained lying flat on their back throughout the day, and interviews with staff revealed that neither therapy nor the DNS were aware of the wound consultant's recommendations. The wound consultant confirmed that she expected therapy and dietary evaluations to have occurred, but was unaware that these had not been completed. Facility policy required rehabilitation screens for residents with significant changes in functional ability, but no such screen or evaluation was found for this resident following the new wound development.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙