Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Document and Communicate Pressure Ulcer Assessment and Interventions

Danbury, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to document weekly assessments and the healing process of a newly identified non-blanchable area of redness on the sacrum for one resident. The resident, who had a history of hemiplegia, insulin-dependent diabetes, and dementia, was at moderate risk for pressure ulcers and required significant assistance with activities of daily living. A non-blanchable area was discovered during incontinent care, and initial interventions such as a specialty mattress, turn and positioning schedule, and barrier paste were planned. Despite these interventions, the clinical record did not show evidence that a physical or occupational therapy evaluation was requested or completed, nor that a specialty mattress was implemented. There was also no documentation of further assessments of the sacral area after the initial finding, nor any record of physician or resident representative notification regarding the new skin issue. The facility's treatment administration record indicated that weekly skin checks were signed off, but there was no specific observation documentation of the sacral area. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the wound nurse and the advanced practice registered nurse were not notified of the new skin issue, and the resident was not added to the weekly wound rounds for further evaluation. The facility's policy required assessment and documentation of significant risk factors and physician involvement in identifying and managing pressure ulcers, but these steps were not followed as documented in the clinical record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙