Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement and Document Fall Prevention Interventions

Windham, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to follow a post-fall care plan for safety interventions for a resident with dementia, lack of coordination, and Parkinsonism. The resident was identified as a fall/safety risk and the care plan required the bed to be kept at the lowest position and floor pads to be placed on each side of the bed. However, after the resident was found on the floor next to the bed following a fall, observations revealed that only one floor mat was present, and the mat was missing from one side of the bed. Staff interviews indicated a lack of awareness regarding the facility's policy on floor mats and uncertainty about the interventions listed in the care plan. Further review showed that there was no physician's order for the floor mats in the resident's clinical record, despite facility policy requiring such an order to alert staff to implement the intervention. The charge nurse was responsible for ensuring interventions were in place, but the required documentation and implementation were not completed as specified in the care plan and facility policy. The facility's policy also directed that documentation in the medical record should include appropriate interventions to prevent future falls, which was not done in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙