Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0804
E

Deficiency in Food Palatability, Appearance, and Temperature

Hartford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors observed that the facility failed to ensure food items were attractive, palatable, and served at an appetizing temperature. During observation of the dietary tray line, waffles were noted to be pale, floppy, and appeared uncooked, as the kitchen's toaster could not accommodate frozen items and thus did not brown the waffles. The Dietary Manager acknowledged these issues and was unable to achieve a higher serving temperature for the waffles, which were measured at 100°F, below the facility's policy requirement of 135°F for hot foods. Residents had previously voiced concerns about food being over or undercooked, with no changes made in response to their feedback. Further observations included a test tray where the main entrée of ham was pale and lacked browning, though it was at an appropriate temperature and tasted acceptable. The sweet potatoes were lumpy and left a lingering spicy aftertaste, while the green peas were soft but visually basic. The fruit, identified as canned pears, had a translucent appearance with accentuated dots and inconsistent texture, ranging from very soft to hard, making it difficult to chew for some residents. The Dietary Manager agreed that the pears' texture could be problematic and attributed the appearance to being packed in water. The facility's policy requires food to be served attractively and at palatable temperatures, which was not consistently met.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙