Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0698
D

Failure to Monitor and Document Fluid Restriction for Resident on Hemolytic Treatment

Bloomfield, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, and anemia was admitted to the facility and required hemolytic treatment. The resident had a physician's order for hemolytic treatment three times per week and a fluid restriction of 1000 cc per 24 hours, as recommended by a nephrologist due to episodes of hypotension during treatment. The care plan and dietary instructions reflected this restriction, with specific fluid amounts allocated for meals and medication administration. Despite these orders, a review of the clinical records, including nursing notes, MAR, and TAR, revealed that there was no documentation or tally of the resident's daily fluid intake from the time the fluid restriction order was implemented. Interviews with nursing staff showed confusion regarding responsibility for tracking fluid intake, with some staff believing it was the responsibility of licensed nurses and others indicating it was a shared responsibility. The fluid restriction order was not visible on the MAR, and staff acknowledged that the order had not been properly activated to prompt documentation. The resident was not aware of the fluid restriction until two days prior to the survey, and reported consuming both facility-provided and outside food and fluids without tracking intake. The dietician confirmed that nursing staff were expected to maintain intake records for residents on fluid restriction, but the order may not have been activated in the system. The facility's policy required nursing personnel to document fluid intake, but this was not done for the resident in question. The facility was unable to demonstrate how the total fluid intake was tracked or maintained for the resident as required by the physician's order.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙