Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
B

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Resident Assessment and ADL Status

Bloomfield, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents, resulting in deficiencies related to resident assessment accuracy. For one resident with diagnoses including schizophrenia, encephalopathy, and morbid obesity, the clinical record showed a Level II PASRR outcome document was on file. The admission MDS assessment correctly indicated a positive Level II PASRR, but the subsequent annual MDS assessment was incorrectly coded as negative for Level II PASRR, despite no change in the resident's status. The Director of Social Work confirmed the inconsistency and was unable to explain the miscoding. For another resident with a history of malignant neoplasm of the left breast, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia, the annual MDS assessment indicated the resident was independent with eating. However, the care plan, nurse aide documentation, and direct observations showed the resident required extensive or total assistance with eating, including the use of adaptive equipment and staff feeding. The Director of Nursing Services acknowledged the conflicting documentation and could not explain the incorrect MDS coding. These findings were based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙