Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0800
E

Failure to Accommodate Resident Food Preferences

Waterford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with diagnoses including right-sided hemiplegia, aphasia, and diabetes, and who was assessed as cognitively intact, was not provided with meals that accommodated their stated food preferences. The resident was on a low calorie sweetener (LCS) diet with regular texture and was to receive large portions and a bedtime snack daily. Despite documentation in the care plan and nutrition assessment that the resident's food preferences, including cultural foods and bone-in meats, should be honored, the facility failed to provide these items. The resident reported receiving bland meals and boneless chicken instead of preferred bone-in chicken legs and thighs, leading them to purchase and store their own food in their room. The clinical record showed that the Director of Food Services had previously been made aware of the resident's preferences and had ordered some culturally appropriate foods, but refused to provide bone-in meats, citing concerns about choking hazards. The Director of Food Services could not provide evidence that the requested cultural foods were currently available in the facility. The Director of Nursing Services was aware of the resident's preferences but was not aware that these preferences were not being accommodated as outlined in the resident's care plan. The facility was unable to provide a policy for accommodating resident food preferences when requested.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙