Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0552
D

Failure to Obtain and Document Resident Consents for Care and Treatment

Waterford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were fully informed and provided with the opportunity to make decisions regarding their care and treatments upon admission. For three of four sampled residents reviewed for advance directives, there were unsigned consent forms for psychoactive medications, emergency use of potassium iodide, mental health services, and vaccinations. Despite residents being cognitively intact and capable of making their own decisions, the required consents were not obtained or documented, and the care plans did not reflect that permissions for these treatments had been secured. In one case, a resident was administered an antipsychotic medication without a signed consent, and the facility acknowledged that, in the event of a nuclear emergency, potassium iodide would have been administered without consent. Interviews with the Director of Nursing Services revealed that it was the responsibility of the LPN or nurse supervisor to ensure that consent forms were signed within two days of admission, but this process was not followed, resulting in unsigned forms remaining in the residents' charts for extended periods. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide a policy for obtaining resident consent prior to treatment, and admission documentation and checklists were incomplete, with blank areas for vaccine dates and missing signatures from residents or their responsible parties.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙